jonnor.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #1,024,304
▼ 447,963
- Rank in TLD
- #421,714
▼ 187,313
- Referring Domains
- 30
▼ 1
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 48.5
- Subdomains
- 2
- Domain age
- 17 yr 5 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 48.5
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 45.4
- Referring Domains
- 30
- Linked Domains
- 200
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 0
10–19 1
20–29 3
30–39 4
40–49 9
50–59 5
60–69 3
70–79 5
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 30
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| gnome.org | 74.7 | #1,361 |
| archlinux.org | 73.4 | #1,752 |
| inria.fr | 72.9 | #1,964 |
| gimp.org | 71.4 | #2,622 |
| lwn.net | 71.0 | #2,790 |
| opensource.com | 69.1 | #3,957 |
| hackaday.io | 68.1 | #4,648 |
| hackaday.com | 64.5 | #8,103 |
| 0pointer.de | 59.2 | #20,021 |
| maemo.org | 57.8 | #26,088 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 17 May 2009
- Last updated
- 17 Apr 2026
- Expires
- 17 May 2027 (193 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- ok
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- One.com A/S
Subdomain
maliit.jonnor.comwww.jonnor.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | jonnor.com | 3600 | 46.30.215.96 |
| AAAA | jonnor.com | 3600 | 2a02:2350:5:111:8000:91f5:fd46:967b |
| MX | jonnor.com | 10800 | 10 mx1.pub.mailpod12-cph3.one.com |
| MX | jonnor.com | 10800 | 10 mx2.pub.mailpod12-cph3.one.com |
| MX | jonnor.com | 10800 | 10 mx3.pub.mailpod12-cph3.one.com |
| MX | jonnor.com | 10800 | 10 mx4.pub.mailpod12-cph3.one.com |
| NS | jonnor.com | 14400 | ns01.one.com |
| NS | jonnor.com | 14400 | ns02.one.com |
| SOA | jonnor.com | 14400 | ns01.one.com. hostmaster.one.com. 2026103101 14400 3600 1209600 600 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.