jonathanhaverkampf.com
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low.
- Global Rank
- #11,103,737
▲ 25,765,887
- Rank in TLD
- #4,778,164
▲ 11,830,092
- Referring Domains
- 6
▲ 2
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 37.1
- Subdomains
- 0
- Domain age
- 13 yr 7 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 37.1
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 23.6
- Referring Domains
- 6
- Linked Domains
- 233
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 0
10–19 2
20–29 2
30–39 0
40–49 0
50–59 1
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 1
90–100 0
Total 6
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| nih.gov | 87.1 | #91 |
| brainzmagazine.com | 56.6 | #32,368 |
| nicolassarrasin.com | 26.6 | #3,798,418 |
| mysafetherapy.com | 20.6 | #8,907,774 |
| perthbraincentre.com.au | 17.7 | #13,832,983 |
| lisawelleschik.at | 14.1 | #22,470,444 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 15 Mar 2013
- Last updated
- 16 Mar 2026
- Expires
- 15 Mar 2027 (130 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientDeleteProhibited clientRenewProhibited clientTransferProhibited clientUpdateProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- GoDaddy.com, LLC
Subdomain
No data
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | jonathanhaverkampf.com | 10800 | 92.204.24.110 |
| MX | jonathanhaverkampf.com | 3600 | 0 mail.jonathanhaverkampf.com |
| NS | jonathanhaverkampf.com | 3600 | ns29.domaincontrol.com |
| NS | jonathanhaverkampf.com | 3600 | ns30.domaincontrol.com |
| SOA | jonathanhaverkampf.com | 3600 | ns29.domaincontrol.com. dns.jomax.net. 2025101801 28800 7200 604800 600 |
| TXT | jonathanhaverkampf.com | 3600 | google-site-verification=lpigl8AvunXaO1uTh_sNq9UiwpQZPunRYyOJaX1JEC8 |
| TXT | jonathanhaverkampf.com | 3600 | v=spf1 a mx ptr include:secureserver.net ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.