jitek.se
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #571,338
▲ 30,245
- Rank in TLD
- #3,424
▲ 162
- Referring Domains
- 87
▼ 10
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 18.4
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 7 yr 7 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 18.4
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 15.3
- Referring Domains
- 87
- Linked Domains
- 4,608
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 14
10–19 53
20–29 8
30–39 7
40–49 4
50–59 0
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 1
Total 87
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| google.com | 99.8 | #1 |
| monofeya.gov.eg | 48.6 | #122,326 |
| sharkia.gov.eg | 48.5 | #124,863 |
| kzntreasury.gov.za | 47.9 | #137,663 |
| thebookreviewindia.org | 41.0 | #413,931 |
| lea-ackermann.fr | 38.1 | #622,755 |
| berlin-gurashi.com | 35.6 | #896,124 |
| tarambana.net | 34.2 | #1,149,073 |
| ci-es.org | 34.1 | #1,157,744 |
| fridayeveryday.com | 33.3 | #1,338,924 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .seSweden
- Registration date
- 12 Mar 2019
- Expires
- 12 Mar 2027 (127 days remaining)
- Registrar
- www.NameSRS.com
Subdomain
www.jitek.se
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | jitek.se | 3600 | 185.76.64.166 |
| MX | jitek.se | 30 | 10 mx2.mailchannels.net |
| MX | jitek.se | 30 | 10 mx1.mailchannels.net |
| NS | jitek.se | 7200 | ns2.misspark.com |
| NS | jitek.se | 7200 | ns1.misspark.com |
| NS | jitek.se | 7200 | ns4.misspark.com |
| NS | jitek.se | 7200 | ns3.misspark.com |
| SOA | jitek.se | 7200 | ns1.misspark.com. admin.misshosting.com. 2023092905 7200 3600 1209600 3600 |
| TXT | jitek.se | 3600 | v=spf1 ip4:185.76.64.166 include:_spf.reliablemail.org include:_spf.misshosting.com include:reliablemail.org +a +mx ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Configuration error
SPF exceeds the limit of 10 DNS lookups.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.