jinlab.jp
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low.
- Global Rank
- #7,304,517
▼ 6,620,035
- Rank in TLD
- #148,746
▼ 130,375
- Referring Domains
- 32
▼ 2
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 21.7
- Subdomains
- 2
- Domain age
- 14 yr 1 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 21.7
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 18.6
- Referring Domains
- 32
- Linked Domains
- 384
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 3
10–19 17
20–29 5
30–39 2
40–49 4
50–59 1
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 32
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| zaikei.co.jp | 52.3 | #65,410 |
| dm-net.co.jp | 48.8 | #117,893 |
| tsuchiura.lg.jp | 48.1 | #133,368 |
| medica.co.jp | 47.5 | #147,443 |
| an-life.jp | 41.0 | #415,347 |
| antaa.jp | 32.6 | #1,489,290 |
| 365college.press | 31.0 | #1,883,449 |
| akabanejinzonaika.com | 29.5 | #2,425,735 |
| ppecc.jp | 25.9 | #4,174,877 |
| tousekice.com | 22.5 | #6,716,173 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .jpJapan
- Registration date
- 27 Sept 2012
- Last updated
- 30 Sept 2026
- Expires
- 30 Sept 2027 (329 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- Active
- Registry
- Japan Registry Services Co., Ltd.
- Registrar
- Onamae.com
Subdomain
sub.jinlab.jpwww.jinlab.jp
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | jinlab.jp | 3600 | 153.121.56.101 |
| MX | jinlab.jp | 600 | 10 mail1030.onamae.ne.jp |
| NS | jinlab.jp | 86400 | 01.dnsv.jp |
| NS | jinlab.jp | 86400 | 02.dnsv.jp |
| NS | jinlab.jp | 86400 | 03.dnsv.jp |
| NS | jinlab.jp | 86400 | 04.dnsv.jp |
| SOA | jinlab.jp | 86400 | 01.dnsv.jp. hostmaster.dnsv.jp. 1772604446 3600 900 604800 300 |
| TXT | jinlab.jp | 600 | v=spf1 include:_spf.onamae.ne.jp ip4:153.121.56.101 ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.