j-iscp.com
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low.
- Global Rank
- #5,523,716
▼ 491,321
- Rank in TLD
- #2,314,491
▼ 203,502
- Referring Domains
- 14
▼ 2
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 35.5
- Subdomains
- 0
- Domain age
- 14 yr 0 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 35.5
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 37.6
- Referring Domains
- 14
- Linked Domains
- 20
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 1
10–19 5
20–29 0
30–39 1
40–49 2
50–59 4
60–69 1
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 14
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| osaka-u.ac.jp | 65.2 | #7,302 |
| world-heart-federation.org | 57.4 | #27,952 |
| hosp.go.jp | 57.1 | #29,695 |
| tokushima-u.ac.jp | 53.0 | #58,600 |
| fmu.ac.jp | 50.5 | #88,208 |
| u-shizuoka-ken.ac.jp | 47.3 | #153,748 |
| tokushima-hosp.jp | 40.4 | #451,929 |
| awawa.app | 34.7 | #1,037,221 |
| congrant.jp | 18.8 | #11,951,298 |
| t-takaya.net | 17.1 | #15,037,080 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 17 Oct 2012
- Last updated
- 17 Sept 2026
- Expires
- 17 Oct 2027 (346 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- GMO Internet Group, Inc. d/b/a Onamae.com
Subdomain
No Observed Data
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | j-iscp.com | 1800 | 157.7.189.180 |
| MX | j-iscp.com | 3600 | 10 mx-proxy501.heteml.jp |
| MX | j-iscp.com | 3600 | 20 mx-proxy502.heteml.jp |
| NS | j-iscp.com | 86400 | dns1.heteml.jp |
| NS | j-iscp.com | 86400 | dns0.heteml.jp |
| SOA | j-iscp.com | 2560 | dns0.heteml.jp. hostmaster.j-iscp.com. 1793852659 16384 2048 1048576 2560 |
| TXT | j-iscp.com | 3600 | v=spf1 include:_spf.heteml.jp ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.