ivfsf.de
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low. This domain has few referring domains.
- Global Rank
- #7,766,370
▼ 316,099
- Rank in TLD
- #426,333
▼ 15,276
- Referring Domains
- 20
▼ 2
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 23.0
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- –
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 23.0
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 18.8
- Referring Domains
- 20
- Linked Domains
- 300
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 1
10–19 10
20–29 4
30–39 4
40–49 0
50–59 0
60–69 0
70–79 1
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 20
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| itch.io | 76.5 | #951 |
| kurd-lasswitz-preis.de | 33.9 | #1,202,904 |
| vorsicht-feuerball.de | 31.1 | #1,843,276 |
| ogok.de | 31.1 | #1,844,014 |
| metropolcon.eu | 30.1 | #2,196,346 |
| rollenspiel-almanach.de | 28.6 | #2,796,358 |
| social-media-schnack.de | 24.0 | #5,480,134 |
| slinfo.de | 22.5 | #6,657,416 |
| kinderrollenspiel.de | 21.2 | #8,055,349 |
| lordofthedices.de | 19.4 | #10,714,316 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .deGermany
- Last updated
- 11 Aug 2026
- Domain statuses
- active
- Registry
- DENIC eG
Subdomain
www.ivfsf.de
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | ivfsf.de | 3600 | 46.38.249.120 |
| AAAA | ivfsf.de | 3600 | 2a03:4000:6d:1b95::24:5709 |
| MX | ivfsf.de | 3600 | 10 mail.ivfsf.de |
| MX | ivfsf.de | 3600 | 50 mxf97a.netcup.net |
| NS | ivfsf.de | 86400 | netcup.fifthns.com |
| NS | ivfsf.de | 86400 | netcup.secondns.at |
| NS | ivfsf.de | 86400 | netcup.fourthns.systems |
| NS | ivfsf.de | 86400 | netcup.firstns.cc |
| NS | ivfsf.de | 86400 | netcup.thirdns.de |
| SOA | ivfsf.de | 86400 | netcup.firstns.cc. dnsadmin.netcup.net. 3 28800 7200 1209600 86400 |
| TXT | ivfsf.de | 3600 | v=spf1 mx a include:_spf.webhosting.systems ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.