itenos.de
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #410,710
▼ 108,256
- Rank in TLD
- #18,183
▼ 4,435
- Referring Domains
- 51
▼ 2
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 32.5
- Subdomains
- 3
- Domain age
- –
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 32.5
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 30.9
- Referring Domains
- 51
- Linked Domains
- 97
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 6
10–19 8
20–29 11
30–39 10
40–49 9
50–59 3
60–69 2
70–79 0
80–89 1
90–100 1
Total 51
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| google.com | 99.8 | #1 |
| atlassian.com | 82.7 | #271 |
| peeringdb.com | 69.7 | #3,559 |
| eco.de | 62.8 | #10,549 |
| greatplacetowork.de | 52.7 | #61,825 |
| ipip.net | 51.8 | #71,318 |
| trusted-cloud.de | 51.5 | #74,315 |
| datacenterjournal.com | 48.4 | #126,252 |
| dotmagazine.online | 48.2 | #131,698 |
| whtop.com | 48.1 | #131,928 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .deGermany
- Last updated
- 2 Aug 2021
- Domain statuses
- active
- Registry
- DENIC eG
Subdomain
kupo.itenos.deumfrage.itenos.dewww.itenos.de
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | itenos.de | 32912 | 193.110.69.106 |
| MX | itenos.de | 32922 | 100 mailin.ng.telekom.net |
| NS | itenos.de | 36122 | ns1.telekom.net |
| NS | itenos.de | 36122 | pns.dtag.de |
| SOA | itenos.de | 36112 | pns.dtag.de. dns.telekom.de. 2026110402 10800 3600 2419200 3600 |
| TXT | itenos.de | 3600 | v=spf1 a mx a:mail.telekom.de include:_spfdtag.itenos.de include:_spfint.itenos.de include:_spft.telekom.com include:_spfext.itenos.de ~all |
| TXT | itenos.de | 3600 | bw=rVW1x2JeXnPHahodO2D0BI5zoPbGY7cvzkb0RACFh70G |
| TXT | itenos.de | 3600 | bw=v72rHzEiU0bZ0NSXVAflUQnjv3dFSFi7LJtvOTTje6F9 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.