isf.es
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #621,284
▲ 62,520
- Rank in TLD
- #3,596
▲ 325
- Referring Domains
- 408
▼ 26
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 26.2
- Subdomains
- 53
- Domain age
- –
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 26.2
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 23.7
- Referring Domains
- 408
- Linked Domains
- 2,052
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 56
10–19 105
20–29 109
30–39 63
40–49 42
50–59 17
60–69 11
70–79 2
80–89 2
90–100 1
Total 408
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| outlook.com | 86.2 | #119 |
| mdpi.com | 80.3 | #459 |
| kde.org | 73.5 | #1,727 |
| abc.es | 70.3 | #3,187 |
| 20minutos.es | 67.9 | #4,787 |
| pbworks.com | 67.8 | #4,918 |
| ucm.es | 66.5 | #5,964 |
| upc.edu | 64.9 | #7,614 |
| upv.es | 64.9 | #7,516 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .esSpain
No registration data could be retrieved.
Subdomain
admin.isf.esagua.isf.eswww.agua.isf.esalbum.isf.eswww.album.isf.esandalucia.isf.eslistas.andalucia.isf.eswww.andalucia.isf.esandaluciapracticaloff.isf.esapd.isf.esaragon.isf.eslistas.aragon.isf.eswww.aragon.isf.esasturias.isf.eswww.asturias.isf.eslistas.baleares.isf.esboletines.isf.escantabria.isf.escatalunya.isf.eswww.catalunya.isf.es
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | isf.es | 6 | 65.21.254.2 |
| MX | isf.es | 60 | 0 mx2.mailchannels.net |
| MX | isf.es | 60 | 0 mx1.mailchannels.net |
| NS | isf.es | 14400 | ns3.dreamhost.com |
| NS | isf.es | 14400 | ns1.dreamhost.com |
| NS | isf.es | 14400 | ns2.dreamhost.com |
| SOA | isf.es | 60 | ns1.dreamhost.com. hostmaster.dreamhost.com. 2026102202 19288 600 1814400 60 |
| TXT | isf.es | 60 | v=spf1 mx include:netblocks.dreamhost.com include:relay.mailchannels.net -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.