ipscuba.net
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #858,713
▼ 133,090
- Rank in TLD
- #28,491
▼ 3,926
- Referring Domains
- 236
▼ 12
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 31.5
- Subdomains
- 2
- Domain age
- 16 yr 7 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 31.5
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 28.5
- Referring Domains
- 236
- Linked Domains
- 546
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 21
10–19 48
20–29 57
30–39 43
40–49 33
50–59 14
60–69 12
70–79 4
80–89 3
90–100 1
Total 236
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| columbia.edu | 85.2 | #151 |
| substack.com | 84.4 | #173 |
| mdpi.com | 80.3 | #459 |
| google.es | 78.8 | #606 |
| vice.com | 77.6 | #760 |
| umn.edu | 76.7 | #913 |
| uci.edu | 73.8 | #1,607 |
| umontreal.ca | 67.2 | #5,330 |
| cpj.org | 67.0 | #5,528 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .net
- Registration date
- 10 Mar 2010
- Last updated
- 4 Nov 2026
- Expires
- 10 Mar 2027 (125 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- ENOM, INC.
Subdomain
fidel-discursos.ipscuba.netwww.ipscuba.net
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | ipscuba.net | 86400 | 179.27.153.3 |
| MX | ipscuba.net | 86400 | 0 ipscuba.net |
| NS | ipscuba.net | 86400 | ns2.netuy.net |
| NS | ipscuba.net | 86400 | ns3.netuy.net |
| NS | ipscuba.net | 86400 | ns1.netuy.net |
| NS | ipscuba.net | 86400 | server343.dinamichosting.com |
| SOA | ipscuba.net | 86400 | ns1.netuy.net. monitor.dinamichosting.com. 2026110202 3600 7200 1209600 86400 |
| TXT | ipscuba.net | 86400 | v=spf1 ip4:179.27.153.3 +a +mx ~all |
| TXT | ipscuba.net | 86400 | google-site-verification=ZJvMbbORLr3wv-vhz4u-eDRFczCwFQ3M5PVNZw6pqUs |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.