ipap.jp
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate. Links from multiple referring domains appear in the observed data. This domain was registered at least three years ago.
- Global Rank
- #432,872
▼ 59,156
- Rank in TLD
- #11,882
▼ 1,262
- Referring Domains
- 212
▼ 23
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 47.6
- Subdomains
- 7
- Domain age
- 9 yr 2 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 47.6
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 52.3
- Referring Domains
- 212
- Linked Domains
- 27
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 8
10–19 15
20–29 22
30–39 25
40–49 22
50–59 56
60–69 46
70–79 14
80–89 3
90–100 1
Total 212
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| mit.edu | 83.2 | #238 |
| google.co.uk | 82.6 | #275 |
| berkeley.edu | 80.7 | #415 |
| duke.edu | 76.0 | #1,046 |
| rutgers.edu | 75.3 | #1,212 |
| utah.edu | 74.8 | #1,333 |
| ucdavis.edu | 74.8 | #1,331 |
| mpg.de | 74.3 | #1,459 |
| ucsb.edu | 72.7 | #2,061 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .jpJapan
- Registration date
- 1 Sept 2017
- Last updated
- 30 Sept 2026
- Expires
- 30 Sept 2027 (329 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- Active DomainTransferLocked AgentChangeLocked
- Registry
- Japan Registry Services Co., Ltd.
- Registrar
- Onamae.com
Subdomain
apex.ipap.jpjjap.ipap.jpjpsj.ipap.jpptp.ipap.jpstorage.ipap.jpstoragex.ipap.jpwww.ipap.jp
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | ipap.jp | 3600 | 210.157.79.54 |
| MX | ipap.jp | 3600 | 0 ipap.jp |
| NS | ipap.jp | 3600 | ns2.wpx.ne.jp |
| NS | ipap.jp | 3600 | ns1.wpx.ne.jp |
| NS | ipap.jp | 3600 | ns3.wpx.ne.jp |
| SOA | ipap.jp | 3600 | ns1.wpx.ne.jp. root.wpx.ne.jp. 0 10800 3600 604800 3600 |
| TXT | ipap.jp | 3600 | v=spf1 +a:sv3053.wpx.ne.jp +a:ipap.jp +mx include:spf.sender.xserver.jp ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.