insamer.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #1,748,627
▲ 274,209
- Rank in TLD
- #731,081
▲ 101,312
- Referring Domains
- 152
▲ 6
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 25.4
- Subdomains
- 2
- Domain age
- 10 yr 7 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 25.4
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 21.7
- Referring Domains
- 152
- Linked Domains
- 1,112
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 23
10–19 41
20–29 40
30–39 27
40–49 5
50–59 6
60–69 7
70–79 2
80–89 0
90–100 1
Total 152
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| ucla.edu | 76.5 | #942 |
| wikibooks.org | 70.9 | #2,888 |
| atlanticcouncil.org | 69.2 | #3,943 |
| openedition.org | 69.1 | #4,027 |
| uvm.edu | 66.0 | #6,385 |
| globalvoices.org | 63.0 | #10,359 |
| yandex.com.tr | 61.3 | #13,890 |
| kemenag.go.id | 61.3 | #13,864 |
| up.ac.za | 61.0 | #14,694 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 8 Mar 2016
- Last updated
- 11 Mar 2026
- Expires
- 8 Mar 2027 (123 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- Name.com, Inc.
Subdomain
en.insamer.comwww.insamer.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | insamer.com | 300 | 172.67.152.167 |
| A | insamer.com | 300 | 104.21.82.36 |
| AAAA | insamer.com | 300 | 2606:4700:3033::6815:5224 |
| AAAA | insamer.com | 300 | 2606:4700:3035::ac43:98a7 |
| MX | insamer.com | 300 | 10 mx.yandex.net |
| NS | insamer.com | 86400 | igor.ns.cloudflare.com |
| NS | insamer.com | 86400 | uma.ns.cloudflare.com |
| SOA | insamer.com | 1800 | igor.ns.cloudflare.com. dns.cloudflare.com. 2417575740 10000 2400 604800 1800 |
| TXT | insamer.com | 300 | v=spf1 redirect=_spf.yandex.net |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.