inprojournal.org
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #1,981,304
▲ 191,630
- Rank in TLD
- #185,078
▲ 9,507
- Referring Domains
- 28
▼ 2
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 36.3
- Subdomains
- 3
- Domain age
- 10 yr 6 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 36.3
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 37.2
- Referring Domains
- 28
- Linked Domains
- 924
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 1
10–19 5
20–29 3
30–39 6
40–49 10
50–59 2
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 1
90–100 0
Total 28
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| doi.org | 86.2 | #117 |
| lnu.edu.ua | 53.2 | #56,735 |
| nau.edu.ua | 50.3 | #91,435 |
| drugpatentwatch.com | 48.8 | #119,116 |
| revistacomunicar.com | 47.8 | #140,275 |
| senescyt.gob.ec | 46.8 | #166,467 |
| ula.org.ua | 46.0 | #188,809 |
| cedem.org.ua | 45.8 | #195,603 |
| stu.cn.ua | 45.4 | #209,267 |
| chl.kiev.ua | 45.2 | #216,593 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .org
- Registration date
- 27 Apr 2016
- Last updated
- 21 Apr 2026
- Expires
- 27 Apr 2027 (173 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- ok
- Registry
- Public Interest Registry (PIR)
- Registrar
- TUCOWS.COM, CO.
Subdomain
test.inprojournal.orguran.inprojournal.orgwww.inprojournal.org
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | inprojournal.org | 300 | 77.42.56.157 |
| MX | inprojournal.org | 300 | 10 mx0.mail7.freehost.com.ua |
| MX | inprojournal.org | 300 | 20 mx1.mail7.freehost.com.ua |
| MX | inprojournal.org | 300 | 30 mx2.mail7.freehost.com.ua |
| NS | inprojournal.org | 86400 | hera.ns.cloudflare.com |
| NS | inprojournal.org | 86400 | venkat.ns.cloudflare.com |
| SOA | inprojournal.org | 1800 | hera.ns.cloudflare.com. dns.cloudflare.com. 2418508679 10000 2400 604800 1800 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.