inka.gr
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #1,179,443
▲ 155,242
- Rank in TLD
- #2,280
▲ 289
- Referring Domains
- 141
▼ 7
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 26.1
- Subdomains
- 2
- Domain age
- –
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 26.1
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 22.1
- Referring Domains
- 141
- Linked Domains
- 37
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 18
10–19 35
20–29 45
30–39 11
40–49 20
50–59 6
60–69 3
70–79 2
80–89 0
90–100 1
Total 141
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| mystrikingly.com | 71.8 | #2,409 |
| wikibooks.org | 70.9 | #2,888 |
| verbraucherzentrale.de | 69.9 | #3,438 |
| sch.gr | 62.0 | #12,324 |
| verbraucherzentrale.nrw | 61.3 | #13,876 |
| mak.ac.ug | 54.3 | #47,093 |
| ertnews.gr | 54.3 | #47,079 |
| verbraucherzentrale-rlp.de | 53.2 | #56,741 |
| vrisko.gr | 52.2 | #66,056 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .grGreece
No data
Subdomain
foodsafety.inka.grwww.inka.gr
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | inka.gr | 14400 | 213.239.213.77 |
| MX | inka.gr | 14400 | 1 ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM |
| MX | inka.gr | 14400 | 5 ALT1.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM |
| MX | inka.gr | 14400 | 10 ALT4.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM |
| MX | inka.gr | 14400 | 5 ALT2.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM |
| MX | inka.gr | 14400 | 10 ALT3.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM |
| NS | inka.gr | 86400 | ns2.hostdns.gr |
| NS | inka.gr | 86400 | ns1.hostdns.gr |
| SOA | inka.gr | 86400 | ns1.hostdns.gr. postmaster.inka.gr. 2026082975 3600 7200 1209600 86400 |
| TXT | inka.gr | 14400 | google-site-verification=m9S0MsE7rwQknIn6N2f8XZSHua6_RN87OFRk7-1es8M |
| TXT | inka.gr | 14400 | v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Configuration error
There is a problem with the DMARC configuration. The DMARC record contains invalid syntax or an invalid tag value.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.