ingsa.org
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #171,190
▲ 26,204
- Rank in TLD
- #19,817
▲ 2,601
- Referring Domains
- 226
▲ 18
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 40.2
- Subdomains
- 2
- Domain age
- 10 yr 9 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 40.2
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 37.0
- Referring Domains
- 226
- Linked Domains
- 1,589
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 11
10–19 28
20–29 45
30–39 36
40–49 36
50–59 28
60–69 22
70–79 11
80–89 6
90–100 3
Total 226
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| google.com | 99.8 | #1 |
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| europa.eu | 90.5 | #44 |
| columbia.edu | 85.2 | #151 |
| un.org | 83.5 | #222 |
| elsevier.com | 80.7 | #420 |
| constantcontact.com | 80.6 | #429 |
| mdpi.com | 80.3 | #459 |
| frontiersin.org | 80.3 | #465 |
| ox.ac.uk | 78.9 | #601 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .org
- Registration date
- 13 Jan 2016
- Last updated
- 5 Nov 2026
- Expires
- 13 Jan 2027 (69 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- Public Interest Registry (PIR)
- Registrar
- ENOM, INC.
Subdomain
covid.ingsa.orgwww.ingsa.org
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | ingsa.org | 300 | 141.193.213.21 |
| A | ingsa.org | 300 | 141.193.213.20 |
| MX | ingsa.org | 300 | 10 mta.1stdomains.net.nz |
| NS | ingsa.org | 300 | ns2.1stdomains.net.nz |
| NS | ingsa.org | 300 | ns1.1stdomains.net.nz |
| SOA | ingsa.org | 300 | ns1.1stdomains.net.nz. hostmaster.1stdomains.net.nz. 2025100706 86400 900 604800 3600 |
| TXT | ingsa.org | 300 | brevo-code:029c3bfa3f08e8cbde74ec8447ab5292 |
| TXT | ingsa.org | 300 | v=spf1 include:_spf.1stdomains.co.nz ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=quarantine, asking receiving servers to quarantine messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.