infobank.pt
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low.
- Global Rank
- #6,144,512
▼ 749,322
- Rank in TLD
- #10,551
▼ 1,170
- Referring Domains
- 186
▼ 7
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 23.1
- Subdomains
- 0
- Domain age
- No data
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 23.1
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 17.8
- Referring Domains
- 186
- Linked Domains
- 67
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 24
10–19 80
20–29 28
30–39 29
40–49 19
50–59 4
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 1
90–100 1
Total 186
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| weebly.com | 87.4 | #85 |
| fogbugz.com | 58.6 | #22,509 |
| archi.fr | 57.8 | #26,092 |
| uha.fr | 54.2 | #47,597 |
| idrettenonline.no | 53.6 | #52,616 |
| bandsworksconcerts.info | 49.9 | #97,469 |
| nashaniva.com | 49.5 | #105,136 |
| uog.edu.et | 49.2 | #109,706 |
| panoptykon.org | 48.4 | #127,189 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .ptPortugal
- Domain statuses
- Registered
- Registry
- Associação DNS.PT
Subdomain
No data
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | infobank.pt | 300 | 104.21.60.118 |
| A | infobank.pt | 300 | 172.67.196.36 |
| AAAA | infobank.pt | 300 | 2606:4700:3032::ac43:c424 |
| AAAA | infobank.pt | 300 | 2606:4700:3030::6815:3c76 |
| MX | infobank.pt | 3600 | 10 mx10.antispam.mailspamprotection.com |
| MX | infobank.pt | 3600 | 20 mx20.antispam.mailspamprotection.com |
| MX | infobank.pt | 3600 | 30 mx30.antispam.mailspamprotection.com |
| NS | infobank.pt | 86400 | frida.ns.cloudflare.com |
| NS | infobank.pt | 86400 | watson.ns.cloudflare.com |
| SOA | infobank.pt | 1800 | frida.ns.cloudflare.com. dns.cloudflare.com. 2418724622 10000 2400 604800 1800 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.