imar.ro
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #137,693
▲ 8,971
- Rank in TLD
- #182
▲ 27
- Referring Domains
- 385
▼ 3
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 36.4
- Subdomains
- 12
- Domain age
- 25 yr 10 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 36.4
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 34.4
- Referring Domains
- 385
- Linked Domains
- 273
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 49
10–19 76
20–29 48
30–39 39
40–49 46
50–59 48
60–69 53
70–79 20
80–89 3
90–100 3
Total 385
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| google.com | 99.8 | #1 |
| github.com | 93.6 | #19 |
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| mit.edu | 83.2 | #238 |
| nvidia.com | 81.0 | #396 |
| mdpi.com | 80.3 | #459 |
| ox.ac.uk | 78.9 | #601 |
| utexas.edu | 77.4 | #796 |
| wisc.edu | 77.3 | #812 |
| washington.edu | 77.0 | #868 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .roRomania
- Registration date
- 1 Jan 2001
- Domain statuses
- OK
- Registrar
- ICI - Registrar
Subdomain
biblio.imar.roci3d.imar.rofit3d.imar.rolibrary.imar.romail7.imar.rons1.imar.ropompeiu.imar.ropostfix.imar.rosc3d.imar.rovision.imar.rowww.imar.rozbl.imar.ro
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | imar.ro | 300 | 193.226.4.7 |
| MX | imar.ro | 300 | 10 mail7.imar.ro |
| NS | imar.ro | 300 | ns2.imar.ro |
| NS | imar.ro | 300 | ns1.imar.ro |
| SOA | imar.ro | 300 | ns1.imar.ro. hostmaster.imar.ro. 2026103001 3600 900 2419200 3600 |
| TXT | imar.ro | 300 | v=spf1 mx ip4:193.226.4.20 |
| TXT | imar.ro | 300 | google-site-verification=vtlGkXfQItt5yC8psNQkbhe5266TMejKwEPvqdxSaz8 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Warning
This SPF policy uses +all or has no all mechanism. Check whether the sender restrictions are appropriate, and consider ~all or -all if needed.
- DMARC
- Valid
DMARC is set to p=reject, asking receiving servers to reject messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.