imageware.at
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low.
- Global Rank
- #4,638,284
▼ 64,512
- Rank in TLD
- #26,986
▲ 40
- Referring Domains
- 6
－
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 34.2
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- No data
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 34.2
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 29.9
- Referring Domains
- 6
- Linked Domains
- 58
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 0
10–19 2
20–29 1
30–39 1
40–49 1
50–59 0
60–69 1
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 6
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| prusa3d.com | 61.8 | #12,662 |
| icar-us.eu | 49.9 | #98,238 |
| inotec.eu | 30.7 | #1,965,831 |
| janichklass.com | 29.1 | #2,583,641 |
| imagewarescanner.com | 18.7 | #12,048,823 |
| bosporus24.de | 15.0 | #19,897,378 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .atAustria
- Registry
- nic.at GmbH
Subdomain
www.imageware.at
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | imageware.at | 3600 | 77.111.241.72 |
| AAAA | imageware.at | 3600 | 2a02:2350:5:104:47:4a66:2384:9324 |
| MX | imageware.at | 10800 | 10 mx3.pub.mailpod10-cph3.one.com |
| MX | imageware.at | 10800 | 10 mx1.pub.mailpod10-cph3.one.com |
| MX | imageware.at | 10800 | 10 mx2.pub.mailpod10-cph3.one.com |
| MX | imageware.at | 10800 | 10 mx4.pub.mailpod10-cph3.one.com |
| NS | imageware.at | 14400 | ns02.one.com |
| NS | imageware.at | 14400 | ns01.one.com |
| SOA | imageware.at | 14400 | ns01.one.com. hostmaster.one.com. 2026100802 14400 3600 1209600 600 |
| TXT | imageware.at | 7200 | v=spf1 include:_custspf.one.com ~all |
| TXT | imageware.at | 3600 | google-site-verification=lGQhgV8ODk3c4LAF5LrrlVht2wXSDskOV5kWA1xtDos |
| TXT | imageware.at | 3600 | MS=993E9DCB82BBBDFF60B1DBFBC1206DEE4037F6F5 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=quarantine, asking receiving servers to quarantine messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.