ijhess.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #258,691
▲ 1,445,246
- Rank in TLD
- #108,418
▲ 593,975
- Referring Domains
- 68
▼ 1
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 34.1
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 5 yr 4 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 34.1
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 33.6
- Referring Domains
- 68
- Linked Domains
- 419
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 5
10–19 9
20–29 12
30–39 20
40–49 10
50–59 9
60–69 1
70–79 1
80–89 1
90–100 0
Total 68
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| doi.org | 86.2 | #117 |
| win.org.tw | 72.5 | #2,110 |
| eprints.org | 60.7 | #15,516 |
| kemdiktisaintek.go.id | 57.2 | #28,936 |
| uny.ac.id | 53.7 | #51,869 |
| unesa.ac.id | 52.8 | #60,780 |
| ut.ac.id | 52.1 | #67,325 |
| unpatti.ac.id | 51.2 | #79,400 |
| uin-malang.ac.id | 51.1 | #80,482 |
| unej.ac.id | 50.9 | #82,493 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 28 Jun 2021
- Last updated
- 8 May 2026
- Expires
- 28 Jun 2027 (236 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- CV. Jogjacamp
Subdomain
www.ijhess.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | ijhess.com | 14400 | 103.30.147.55 |
| MX | ijhess.com | 14400 | 0 ijhess.com |
| NS | ijhess.com | 86400 | ns1.idwebhost.com |
| NS | ijhess.com | 86400 | ns2.idwebhost.com |
| SOA | ijhess.com | 86400 | ns1.idwebhost.com. emailserver.jcamp.net. 2026110101 3600 1800 1209600 86400 |
| TXT | ijhess.com | 14400 | v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:103.30.147.55 +ip4:203.161.184.61 +include:_spf-all.idweb.host +ip4:203.161.184.13 +ip4:103.30.147.102 +ip4:103.30.147.105 +ip4:203.161.184.89 ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Configuration error
SPF exceeds the limit of 10 DNS lookups.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.