ifacca.org
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #663,178
▼ 9,917
- Rank in TLD
- #73,347
▼ 1,345
- Referring Domains
- 242
–
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 33.3
- Subdomains
- 2
- Domain age
- 25 yr 6 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 33.3
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 30.9
- Referring Domains
- 242
- Linked Domains
- 760
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 19
10–19 42
20–29 57
30–39 43
40–49 38
50–59 22
60–69 11
70–79 5
80–89 3
90–100 2
Total 242
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| europa.eu | 90.5 | #44 |
| nih.gov | 87.1 | #91 |
| wikimedia.org | 85.2 | #150 |
| weforum.org | 81.2 | #374 |
| upenn.edu | 78.7 | #620 |
| edweek.org | 72.6 | #2,072 |
| ning.com | 72.1 | #2,291 |
| gov.si | 71.3 | #2,628 |
| springernature.com | 70.1 | #3,310 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .org
- Registration date
- 17 Apr 2001
- Last updated
- 12 Aug 2026
- Expires
- 17 Apr 2029 (894 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- Public Interest Registry (PIR)
- Registrar
- Key-Systems GmbH
Subdomain
media.ifacca.orgwww.ifacca.org
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | ifacca.org | 60 | 18.155.75.39 |
| A | ifacca.org | 60 | 18.155.75.7 |
| A | ifacca.org | 60 | 18.155.75.54 |
| A | ifacca.org | 60 | 18.155.75.78 |
| MX | ifacca.org | 300 | 10 ifacca-org.mail.protection.outlook.com |
| NS | ifacca.org | 86400 | austin.ns.cloudflare.com |
| NS | ifacca.org | 86400 | megan.ns.cloudflare.com |
| SOA | ifacca.org | 1800 | austin.ns.cloudflare.com. dns.cloudflare.com. 2417134889 10000 2400 604800 1800 |
| TXT | ifacca.org | 300 | v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:mailgun.org include:_spf.createsend.com -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=quarantine, asking receiving servers to quarantine messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.