ideaxidea.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #315,346
▼ 7,378
- Rank in TLD
- #131,336
▼ 3,793
- Referring Domains
- 573
▼ 42
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 25.5
- Subdomains
- 2
- Domain age
- 21 yr 6 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 25.5
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 22.3
- Referring Domains
- 573
- Linked Domains
- 896
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 72
10–19 177
20–29 138
30–39 103
40–49 39
50–59 19
60–69 15
70–79 8
80–89 1
90–100 1
Total 573
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wordpress.org | 93.7 | #18 |
| hatena.ne.jp | 82.7 | #270 |
| atlassian.net | 79.5 | #543 |
| cmu.edu | 79.4 | #555 |
| fc2.com | 77.6 | #755 |
| biglobe.ne.jp | 73.4 | #1,787 |
| livedoor.jp | 72.6 | #2,091 |
| ma.tt | 72.0 | #2,353 |
| blog.jp | 71.0 | #2,805 |
| impress.co.jp | 70.0 | #3,362 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 3 May 2005
- Last updated
- 5 Nov 2026
- Expires
- 3 May 2027 (179 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- ENOM, INC.
Subdomain
ph-images.ideaxidea.comwww.ideaxidea.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | ideaxidea.com | 300 | 172.67.219.157 |
| A | ideaxidea.com | 300 | 104.21.17.25 |
| AAAA | ideaxidea.com | 300 | 2606:4700:3037::ac43:db9d |
| AAAA | ideaxidea.com | 300 | 2606:4700:3037::6815:1119 |
| MX | ideaxidea.com | 300 | 10 _dc-mx.747aaaca2920.ideaxidea.com |
| NS | ideaxidea.com | 86400 | lloyd.ns.cloudflare.com |
| NS | ideaxidea.com | 86400 | raquel.ns.cloudflare.com |
| SOA | ideaxidea.com | 1800 | lloyd.ns.cloudflare.com. dns.cloudflare.com. 2419287276 10000 2400 604800 1800 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Configuration error
An MX record has an invalid priority or hostname.
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.