ictae.edu.mx
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #231,571
▲ 4,248
- Rank in TLD
- #443
▼ 15
- Referring Domains
- 1,451
▲ 85
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 22.0
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 19 yr 4 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 22.0
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 16.9
- Referring Domains
- 1,451
- Linked Domains
- 717
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 167
10–19 735
20–29 238
30–39 87
40–49 124
50–59 85
60–69 8
70–79 4
80–89 2
90–100 1
Total 1,451
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| google.com | 99.8 | #1 |
| acm.org | 85.6 | #137 |
| hatena.ne.jp | 82.7 | #270 |
| gamblingtherapy.org | 78.2 | #677 |
| telegra.ph | 72.9 | #1,958 |
| ning.com | 72.1 | #2,291 |
| google.com.tr | 71.0 | #2,831 |
| nabble.com | 67.9 | #4,807 |
| pbase.com | 66.6 | #5,919 |
| xrea.com | 65.7 | #6,740 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .mxMexico
- Registration date
- 7 Jun 2007
- Expires
- 6 Jun 2027 (213 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- Mexico
- Registry
- NIC-Mexico ITESM - Campus Monterrey
- Registrar
- NEUBOX Internet SA de CV
Subdomain
www.ictae.edu.mx
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | ictae.edu.mx | 3600 | 185.230.63.186 |
| A | ictae.edu.mx | 3600 | 185.230.63.107 |
| A | ictae.edu.mx | 3600 | 185.230.63.171 |
| MX | ictae.edu.mx | 3600 | 10 mailb.correonegocios.com |
| MX | ictae.edu.mx | 3600 | 10 maila.correonegocios.com |
| NS | ictae.edu.mx | 86400 | ns14.wixdns.net |
| NS | ictae.edu.mx | 86400 | ns15.wixdns.net |
| SOA | ictae.edu.mx | 3600 | ns14.wixdns.net. support.wix.com. 2016062118 10800 3600 1209600 3600 |
| TXT | ictae.edu.mx | 3600 | google-site-verification=etmR9XBavUiQhBm3xd_F7TPUAmJr8bqutSEWGu42xec |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.