helsam.nu
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low.
- Global Rank
- #9,989,205
▲ 19,863
- Rank in TLD
- #5,746
▲ 167
- Referring Domains
- 171
▲ 22
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 16.6
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 8 yr 10 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 16.6
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 15.5
- Referring Domains
- 171
- Linked Domains
- 653
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 26
10–19 105
20–29 28
30–39 8
40–49 3
50–59 1
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 171
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| helsingborg.se | 52.9 | #59,585 |
| sideqik.com | 45.5 | #206,960 |
| fgnpowerco.ng | 40.8 | #430,179 |
| odl-shukatsucafe.com | 40.1 | #475,617 |
| prettywhite.co | 39.2 | #537,246 |
| mppee.gob.ve | 38.0 | #630,605 |
| sandeepwaghmore.in | 37.9 | #643,720 |
| cirebonkab.go.id | 36.8 | #742,187 |
| unboundnow.org | 36.3 | #801,109 |
| zubancordoba.com | 32.8 | #1,456,944 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .nuNiue
- Registration date
- 28 Dec 2017
- Expires
- 28 Dec 2026 (53 days remaining)
- Registry
- The IUSN Foundation
- Registrar
- One.com
Subdomain
www.helsam.nu
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | helsam.nu | 3600 | 77.111.240.182 |
| AAAA | helsam.nu | 3600 | 2a02:2350:5:102:80b5:69e3:5d2f:a23d |
| MX | helsam.nu | 10800 | 10 mx1.mailpod16-cph3.g1i.one.com |
| MX | helsam.nu | 10800 | 10 mx2.mailpod16-cph3.g1i.one.com |
| MX | helsam.nu | 10800 | 10 mx3.mailpod16-cph3.g1i.one.com |
| MX | helsam.nu | 10800 | 10 mx4.mailpod16-cph3.g1i.one.com |
| NS | helsam.nu | 14400 | ns01.one.com |
| NS | helsam.nu | 14400 | ns02.one.com |
| SOA | helsam.nu | 14400 | ns01.one.com. hostmaster.one.com. 2026110101 14400 3600 1209600 600 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.