hawks.fr
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low. This domain was registered at least three years ago. This domain has few referring domains.
- Global Rank
- #20,576,381
▲ 6,482,360
- Rank in TLD
- #384,581
▲ 130,529
- Referring Domains
- 4
▲ 1
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 24.5
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 8 yr 0 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 24.5
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 21.6
- Referring Domains
- 4
- Linked Domains
- 111
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 0
10–19 2
20–29 1
30–39 1
40–49 0
50–59 0
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 4
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| ffbs.fr | 35.9 | #852,554 |
| laguerchedebretagne.fr | 23.5 | #5,819,950 |
| jake.eu | 19.6 | #10,433,102 |
| cd35baseball.com | 19.0 | #11,544,467 |
Basic Information
Subdomain
www.hawks.fr
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | hawks.fr | 60 | 145.223.124.170 |
| A | hawks.fr | 60 | 88.223.87.255 |
| AAAA | hawks.fr | 60 | 2a02:4780:4d:2b49:b470:8008:1ed:bc1d |
| AAAA | hawks.fr | 60 | 2a02:4780:4a:1a4c:e668:5e37:9a77:c468 |
| MX | hawks.fr | 14400 | 5 alt1.aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | hawks.fr | 14400 | 5 alt2.aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | hawks.fr | 14400 | 6 alt4.aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | hawks.fr | 14400 | 6 alt3.aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | hawks.fr | 14400 | 1 aspmx.l.google.com |
| NS | hawks.fr | 86400 | ns2.dns-parking.com |
| NS | hawks.fr | 86400 | ns1.dns-parking.com |
| SOA | hawks.fr | 3600 | ns1.dns-parking.com. dns.hostinger.com. 2026110501 10000 2400 604800 600 |
| TXT | hawks.fr | 14400 | google-site-verification=O90xJI60INZ2myJycmEVpMyRW0WIhNvw3fbj-tU2VMg |
| TXT | hawks.fr | 14400 | v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:_mailcust.gandi.net include:_spf.mail.hostinger.com ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.