Skip to content

granneman.com

Its Domain Power Rank is moderate. This domain was registered at least 20 years ago. Links from multiple referring domains appear in the observed data.

Domain Power Rank
36.0
About Domain Power Rank
Global Rank
#835,398

▲ 35,860

Rank in TLD
#343,496

▲ 13,336

Referring Domains
107

▲ 7

Avg. Referrer Power Rank
32.3
Subdomains
10
Domain age
29 yr 1 mo

Referring Domains

Top referring domains
Referring domain Power Rank Global Rank
shopify.com92.5#28
wikipedia.org91.8#34
debian.org79.1#584
iu.edu71.1#2,773
mail-archive.com68.2#4,623
jalopnik.com61.7#12,846
seobility.net60.4#16,152
documentfoundation.org60.2#16,918
packagecontrol.io60.1#17,122
well.com59.1#20,424

Basic Information

TLD
.com
Registration date
6 Sept 1997
Last updated
6 Aug 2025
Expires
5 Sept 2028 (670 days remaining)
Registrar
NAMECHEAP INC

Subdomain

blog.granneman.comdev.granneman.comfiles.granneman.comftp.granneman.comimages.granneman.comwu.granneman.comfiles.wu.granneman.comimages.wu.granneman.comwusearch.granneman.comwww.granneman.com

DNS

DNS
Type Name TTL Value
Agranneman.com30023.239.25.194
AAAAgranneman.com3002600:3c00::2000:abff:fe09:fda2
MXgranneman.com179910 mail.mailroute.net
NSgranneman.com1800dns1.registrar-servers.com
NSgranneman.com1800dns2.registrar-servers.com
SOAgranneman.com3601dns1.registrar-servers.com. hostmaster.registrar-servers.com. 1774237244 43200 3600 604800 3601
TXTgranneman.com600adn_verification=granneman
TXTgranneman.com600v=spf1 include:spf.messagingengine.com -all
TXTgranneman.com600google-site-verification=uSnoNN6ems_0YkRwOie772KVAvBMRthX4PM8NIOGaec
CAAgranneman.com17990 iodef "mailto:admin@websanity.com"
CAAgranneman.com17990 issue "letsencrypt.org"

Email Authentication

MX
Valid
SPF
Valid
DMARC
Valid

DMARC is set to p=reject, asking receiving servers to reject messages that fail authentication.

Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.