gotokyo.org
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively high.
- Global Rank
- #29,245
▲ 4,742
- Rank in TLD
- #3,368
▲ 573
- Referring Domains
- 3,557
▲ 137
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 23.2
- Subdomains
- 4
- Domain age
- 15 yr 0 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 23.2
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 20.0
- Referring Domains
- 3,557
- Linked Domains
- 1,189
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 744
10–19 1,031
20–29 823
30–39 419
40–49 272
50–59 162
60–69 65
70–79 31
80–89 6
90–100 4
Total 3,557
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| google.com | 99.8 | #1 |
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| yandex.ru | 90.3 | #47 |
| squarespace.com | 90.3 | #46 |
| wikimedia.org | 85.2 | #150 |
| hatena.ne.jp | 82.7 | #270 |
| weforum.org | 81.2 | #374 |
| marriott.com | 80.6 | #426 |
| airbnb.com | 80.6 | #423 |
| constantcontact.com | 80.6 | #429 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .org
- Registration date
- 31 Oct 2011
- Last updated
- 20 Oct 2026
- Expires
- 31 Oct 2027 (360 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- ok
- Registry
- Public Interest Registry (PIR)
- Registrar
- GMO Internet Group, Inc. d/b/a Onamae.com
Subdomain
www.gourmet.gotokyo.orginfo.gotokyo.orgwww.tickets.gotokyo.orgwww.gotokyo.org
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | gotokyo.org | 300 | 210.152.103.238 |
| MX | gotokyo.org | 300 | 10 mx.securemx.jp |
| NS | gotokyo.org | 86400 | 01.dnsv.jp |
| NS | gotokyo.org | 86400 | 02.dnsv.jp |
| NS | gotokyo.org | 86400 | 03.dnsv.jp |
| NS | gotokyo.org | 86400 | 04.dnsv.jp |
| SOA | gotokyo.org | 86400 | 01.dnsv.jp. hostmaster.dnsv.jp. 1777366096 3600 900 604800 300 |
| TXT | gotokyo.org | 300 | v=spf1 include:spf.securemx.jp -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.