git-sicherheit.de
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate. Links from multiple referring domains appear in the observed data.
- Global Rank
- #179,310
▼ 20,787
- Rank in TLD
- #7,543
▼ 608
- Referring Domains
- 273
▼ 8
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 30.6
- Subdomains
- 2
- Domain age
- –
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 30.6
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 28.3
- Referring Domains
- 273
- Linked Domains
- 1,071
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 17
10–19 49
20–29 80
30–39 53
40–49 49
50–59 17
60–69 6
70–79 1
80–89 0
90–100 1
Total 273
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| fraunhofer.de | 74.2 | #1,503 |
| honeywell.com | 69.4 | #3,733 |
| messefrankfurt.com | 69.2 | #3,896 |
| short.gy | 66.3 | #6,154 |
| uni-wuppertal.de | 61.0 | #14,526 |
| hornetsecurity.com | 60.3 | #16,413 |
| phoenixcontact.com | 60.1 | #17,105 |
| iot-analytics.com | 58.7 | #22,212 |
| unibw.de | 58.5 | #23,229 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .deGermany
- Last updated
- 20 Jan 2020
- Domain statuses
- active
- Registry
- DENIC eG
Subdomain
publikationen.git-sicherheit.dewww.git-sicherheit.de
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | git-sicherheit.de | 60 | 212.1.56.122 |
| MX | git-sicherheit.de | 1800 | 10 mxa-0053b401.gslb.pphosted.com |
| MX | git-sicherheit.de | 1800 | 10 mxb-0053b401.gslb.pphosted.com |
| NS | git-sicherheit.de | 21600 | ns2.she.de |
| NS | git-sicherheit.de | 21600 | ns.she.de |
| SOA | git-sicherheit.de | 21600 | ns.she.de. hostmaster.she.de. 2026102700 43200 7200 1209600 86400 |
| TXT | git-sicherheit.de | 300 | 201708101233445lfj5mddro5zcn1byyjh44xle32fpjb1xqjxn2pq2fwyyyanr5 |
| TXT | git-sicherheit.de | 300 | MS=ms12646570 |
| TXT | git-sicherheit.de | 300 | Domainname protected by SHE |
| TXT | git-sicherheit.de | 300 | v=spf1 include:spf.mailjet.com include:spf.webjazz.de -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.