gishadev.com
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low.
- Global Rank
- #4,100,689
▲ 13,801,109
- Rank in TLD
- #1,718,152
▲ 6,037,409
- Referring Domains
- 3
▲ 1
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 62.0
- Subdomains
- 2
- Domain age
- 5 yr 3 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 62.0
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 76.5
- Referring Domains
- 3
- Linked Domains
- 37
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 0
10–19 1
20–29 0
30–39 0
40–49 0
50–59 0
60–69 0
70–79 1
80–89 0
90–100 1
Total 3
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| github.com | 93.6 | #19 |
| itch.io | 76.5 | #951 |
| drewworks.dev | 15.9 | #17,674,687 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 23 Jul 2021
- Last updated
- 31 Oct 2026
- Expires
- 23 Jul 2028 (626 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- pendingTransfer
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- GoDaddy.com, LLC
Subdomain
useful.gishadev.comwww.gishadev.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | gishadev.com | 300 | 172.67.198.66 |
| A | gishadev.com | 300 | 104.21.36.180 |
| AAAA | gishadev.com | 300 | 2606:4700:3033::ac43:c642 |
| AAAA | gishadev.com | 300 | 2606:4700:3035::6815:24b4 |
| MX | gishadev.com | 300 | 10 mx2.hostinger.com |
| MX | gishadev.com | 300 | 5 mx1.hostinger.com |
| NS | gishadev.com | 86400 | david.ns.cloudflare.com |
| NS | gishadev.com | 86400 | linda.ns.cloudflare.com |
| SOA | gishadev.com | 1800 | david.ns.cloudflare.com. dns.cloudflare.com. 2419215443 10000 2400 604800 1800 |
| TXT | gishadev.com | 300 | google-site-verification=VRoIgFtXhVSVClAq7bJejX8s6EH5rIi6FsCSEmRuB7k |
| TXT | gishadev.com | 300 | v=spf1 include:_spf.mail.hostinger.com ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.