gerondif.org
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low.
- Global Rank
- #2,519,290
▲ 224,769
- Rank in TLD
- #225,546
▲ 12,111
- Referring Domains
- 41
▲ 3
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 37.2
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 9 yr 9 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 37.2
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 35.1
- Referring Domains
- 41
- Linked Domains
- 140
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 0
10–19 5
20–29 8
30–39 15
40–49 4
50–59 3
60–69 5
70–79 1
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 41
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| weezevent.com | 70.2 | #3,257 |
| sante.fr | 69.9 | #3,421 |
| hypotheses.org | 67.0 | #5,550 |
| iledefrance.fr | 62.8 | #10,723 |
| aphp.fr | 60.3 | #16,425 |
| esante.gouv.fr | 60.2 | #16,727 |
| cite-sciences.fr | 56.9 | #30,398 |
| makesense.org | 53.9 | #50,369 |
| irdes.fr | 50.2 | #92,566 |
| silvereco.fr | 47.9 | #137,548 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .org
- Registration date
- 26 Jan 2017
- Last updated
- 28 Oct 2026
- Expires
- 26 Jan 2027 (82 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- Public Interest Registry (PIR)
- Registrar
- GANDI SAS
Subdomain
www.gerondif.org
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | gerondif.org | 10800 | 23.236.62.147 |
| MX | gerondif.org | 10800 | 5 gerondif-org.mail.protection.outlook.com |
| NS | gerondif.org | 10800 | ns-164-b.gandi.net |
| NS | gerondif.org | 10800 | ns-225-a.gandi.net |
| NS | gerondif.org | 10800 | ns-188-c.gandi.net |
| SOA | gerondif.org | 10800 | ns1.gandi.net. hostmaster.gandi.net. 1793836800 10800 3600 604800 10800 |
| TXT | gerondif.org | 1800 | v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf.cloud.vadesecure.com -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.