gentlysallim.com
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low.
- Global Rank
- #13,949,083
▲ 1,207,512
- Rank in TLD
- #6,027,671
▲ 512,459
- Referring Domains
- 23
▼ 1
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 21.2
- Subdomains
- 0
- Domain age
- 7 yr 2 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 21.2
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 18.8
- Referring Domains
- 23
- Linked Domains
- 78
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 6
10–19 6
20–29 7
30–39 1
40–49 1
50–59 1
60–69 0
70–79 1
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 23
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| tistory.com | 72.1 | #2,307 |
| casinositewiki.com | 52.1 | #67,166 |
| thewordcracker.com | 40.4 | #456,692 |
| hyeonseok.com | 35.2 | #961,933 |
| wook.it.kr | 28.1 | #3,054,559 |
| dtsfinance.com.au | 24.8 | #4,920,303 |
| james-scholes.com | 23.9 | #5,519,383 |
| germanyapteka.com | 22.1 | #7,032,941 |
| seikensha.net | 21.9 | #7,240,153 |
| nanumtip.com | 21.7 | #7,487,269 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 2 Sept 2019
- Last updated
- 24 Oct 2026
- Expires
- 3 Sept 2027 (302 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- client transfer prohibited transfer prohibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- NameSilo, LLC
Subdomain
No Observed Data
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | gentlysallim.com | 300 | 141.164.40.218 |
| MX | gentlysallim.com | 300 | 20 mx2.zoho.com |
| MX | gentlysallim.com | 300 | 10 mx.zoho.com |
| MX | gentlysallim.com | 300 | 50 mx3.zoho.com |
| NS | gentlysallim.com | 300 | ns1.vultr.com |
| NS | gentlysallim.com | 300 | ns2.vultr.com |
| SOA | gentlysallim.com | 300 | ns1.vultr.com. dnsadm.choopa.com. 0 10800 3600 604800 3600 |
| TXT | gentlysallim.com | 3600 | v=spf1 include:zohomail.com ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.