gefma.de
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #242,531
▼ 18,223
- Rank in TLD
- #10,373
▼ 366
- Referring Domains
- 288
▼ 2
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 27.7
- Subdomains
- 4
- Domain age
- –
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 27.7
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 25.4
- Referring Domains
- 288
- Linked Domains
- 1,279
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 27
10–19 74
20–29 80
30–39 51
40–49 27
50–59 18
60–69 8
70–79 2
80–89 0
90–100 1
Total 288
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| bayern.de | 77.4 | #793 |
| hessen.de | 73.6 | #1,707 |
| tu-darmstadt.de | 66.6 | #5,854 |
| uni-due.de | 65.5 | #6,903 |
| eveeno.com | 65.5 | #6,928 |
| tuv.com | 65.1 | #7,359 |
| zhaw.ch | 63.0 | #10,269 |
| uni-weimar.de | 61.4 | #13,573 |
| dinmedia.de | 60.7 | #15,508 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .deGermany
- Last updated
- 19 May 2026
- Domain statuses
- active
- Registry
- DENIC eG
Subdomain
dev.gefma.deevents.gefma.deformulare.gefma.dewww.gefma.de
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | gefma.de | 60 | 185.215.158.114 |
| AAAA | gefma.de | 60 | 2a03:2a01:a330:a::2 |
| MX | gefma.de | 60 | 10 gefma-de.mail.protection.outlook.com |
| NS | gefma.de | 3600 | ns01.agenturserver.co |
| NS | gefma.de | 3600 | ns01.agenturserver.it |
| NS | gefma.de | 3600 | ns01.agenturserver.de |
| SOA | gefma.de | 10800 | ns01.agenturserver.de. support.mittwald.de. 2026110518 28800 7200 604800 3600 |
| TXT | gefma.de | 60 | v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:agenturserver.de ip4:46.163.89.0/24 ip4:195.227.71.0/24 include:spf.nl2go.com -all |
| TXT | gefma.de | 60 | MS=ms56311375 |
| TXT | gefma.de | 60 | v=DKIM1; k=rsa; p=MIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQC8QZZejJbqH0O5rYY5fLTMNlVgXOmfmE0xvi4OG5REd0ouQb3IjkONWHCXrcHOLAQpB3BLiDs4A5kQ3r3qH5r7ZprDQ9PgE23iM+zIov6Trtku2bduqeTCKFzKh9ftAqrBXRSZPfjPUF+Ry4POudsjx+ZvITXQVHRYRdMErRgx2wIDAQAB; |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Valid
DMARC is set to p=reject, asking receiving servers to reject messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.