gasimo.org
This relatively new domain has few observed referring domains and a low Domain Power Rank.
- Global Rank
- #20,934,034
▲ 5,218,228
- Rank in TLD
- #1,295,929
▲ 223,347
- Referring Domains
- 4
▲ 2
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 35.2
- Subdomains
- 0
- Domain age
- 1 yr 2 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 35.2
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 38.1
- Referring Domains
- 4
- Linked Domains
- 332
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 0
10–19 0
20–29 1
30–39 1
40–49 2
50–59 0
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 4
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| metal.so | 42.8 | #314,439 |
| saashero.net | 42.7 | #321,694 |
| fluum.ai | 33.4 | #1,302,950 |
| foundera.co | 22.0 | #7,135,068 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .org
- Registration date
- 25 Aug 2025
- Last updated
- 14 Aug 2026
- Expires
- 25 Aug 2027 (293 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientDeleteProhibited clientRenewProhibited clientTransferProhibited clientUpdateProhibited
- Registry
- Public Interest Registry (PIR)
- Registrar
- GoDaddy.com, LLC
Subdomain
No Observed Data
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | gasimo.org | 60 | 88.222.222.231 |
| A | gasimo.org | 60 | 2.57.91.1 |
| AAAA | gasimo.org | 60 | 2a02:4780:84:99f:2db0:ba64:75ed:cde0 |
| AAAA | gasimo.org | 60 | 2a02:4780:84:7687:7542:ce74:a321:25e5 |
| MX | gasimo.org | 3600 | 1 smtp.google.com |
| NS | gasimo.org | 86400 | hermes.dns-parking.com |
| NS | gasimo.org | 86400 | artemis.dns-parking.com |
| SOA | gasimo.org | 3600 | hermes.dns-parking.com. dns.hostinger.com. 2026110501 10000 2400 604800 600 |
| TXT | gasimo.org | 3600 | v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Configuration error
There is a problem with the DMARC configuration. Multiple DMARC records were found, making the policy invalid.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.