fylom.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #653,666
▲ 119,989
- Rank in TLD
- #267,946
▲ 47,825
- Referring Domains
- 4
▲ 2
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 51.5
- Subdomains
- 0
- Domain age
- 1 yr 1 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 51.5
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 50.0
- Referring Domains
- 4
- Linked Domains
- 2,954
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 2
10–19 0
20–29 0
30–39 0
40–49 0
50–59 0
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 2
Total 4
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| google.com | 99.8 | #1 |
| apple.com | 93.5 | #22 |
| sigpik.com | 6.5 | #66,889,864 |
| idealsmile.studio | 6.2 | #70,448,035 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 1 Oct 2025
- Last updated
- 6 Mar 2026
- Expires
- 1 Oct 2027 (330 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientDeleteProhibited clientRenewProhibited clientTransferProhibited clientUpdateProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- GoDaddy.com, LLC
Subdomain
No Observed Data
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | fylom.com | 600 | 216.24.57.1 |
| MX | fylom.com | 3600 | 10 alt4.aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | fylom.com | 3600 | 10 alt3.aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | fylom.com | 3600 | 5 alt2.aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | fylom.com | 3600 | 5 alt1.aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | fylom.com | 3600 | 1 aspmx.l.google.com |
| NS | fylom.com | 3600 | ns47.domaincontrol.com |
| NS | fylom.com | 3600 | ns48.domaincontrol.com |
| SOA | fylom.com | 3600 | ns47.domaincontrol.com. dns.jomax.net. 2026103100 28800 7200 604800 600 |
| TXT | fylom.com | 3600 | v=spf1 include:dc-aa8e722993._spfm.fylom.com ~all |
| TXT | fylom.com | 3600 | google-site-verification=oWy-FUFJpPv9sM7ZsYbF6fFvZZ2Amv1I9EkaXxC-ZFw |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=quarantine, asking receiving servers to quarantine messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.