Skip to content

futureforum.com

  • Domain Power global ranking: #30,005

Its Domain Power Rank is relatively high. This domain was registered at least 20 years ago. Links from a broad range of domains appear in the observed data.

Domain Power Rank
57.0
About Domain Power Rank
Global Rank
#30,005

▼ 323

Rank in TLD
#13,759

▼ 247

Referring Domains
1,169

▲ 9

Avg. Referrer Power Rank
38.5
Subdomains
1
Domain age
25 yr 1 mo

Referring Domains

Top referring domains
Referring domain Power Rank Global Rank
google.com99.8#1
adobe.com90.7#43
bit.ly88.4#67
dropbox.com87.6#82
nih.gov87.1#91
substack.com84.4#173
atlassian.com82.7#271
businessinsider.com82.6#277
slack.com82.1#311
businesswire.com82.1#308

Basic Information

TLD
.com
Registration date
23 Sept 2001
Last updated
22 Aug 2026
Expires
23 Sept 2028 (688 days remaining)
Registrar
Markmonitor Inc.

Subdomain

www.futureforum.com

DNS

DNS
Type Name TTL Value
Afutureforum.com2407192.0.66.200
MXfutureforum.com360010 mxa-00177002.gslb.pphosted.com
MXfutureforum.com360010 mxb-00177002.gslb.pphosted.com
NSfutureforum.com3600dns1.p03.nsone.net
NSfutureforum.com3600dns2.p03.nsone.net
NSfutureforum.com3600dns3.p03.nsone.net
NSfutureforum.com3600dns4.p03.nsone.net
NSfutureforum.com3600ns01.slackdns.com
NSfutureforum.com3600ns02.slackdns.com
NSfutureforum.com3600ns03.slackdns.com
NSfutureforum.com3600ns04.slackdns.com
SOAfutureforum.com3600dns1.p03.nsone.net. hostmaster.nsone.net. 1650556985 43200 7200 1209600 3600
TXTfutureforum.com3600google-site-verification=sB3aXKtfQ_gDq3GEjjCf4TRT8vDMGh8jYfVsiFDuDjg
TXTfutureforum.com3600google-site-verification=rh7hExao1TbVg-iZY4cOSzFnTLfSrY3bw8pFx3iSzbs

Email Authentication

MX
Valid
SPF
Not configured

No matching DNS record was found.

DMARC
Valid

DMARC is set to p=reject, asking receiving servers to reject messages that fail authentication.

Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.