folken.no
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #1,393,051
▲ 370,633
- Rank in TLD
- #4,697
▲ 974
- Referring Domains
- 85
▲ 10
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 28.1
- Subdomains
- 2
- Domain age
- 10 yr 6 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 28.1
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 26.9
- Referring Domains
- 85
- Linked Domains
- 41
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 6
10–19 23
20–29 25
30–39 20
40–49 4
50–59 2
60–69 3
70–79 0
80–89 1
90–100 1
Total 85
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| europa.eu | 90.5 | #44 |
| weebly.com | 87.4 | #85 |
| liu.se | 69.8 | #3,522 |
| rogalyd.no | 62.2 | #11,843 |
| wikivoyage.org | 60.6 | #15,751 |
| uis.no | 57.3 | #28,447 |
| stavanger.kommune.no | 50.5 | #88,225 |
| konstnarsnamnden.se | 47.1 | #157,038 |
| solvberget.no | 45.7 | #199,147 |
| europejazz.net | 42.8 | #314,025 |
Basic Information
Subdomain
linuxen.folken.nowww.folken.no
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | folken.no | 900 | 49.13.104.125 |
| MX | folken.no | 300 | 0 spamfilter.nordichosting.com |
| NS | folken.no | 86400 | ns2.nordic.hosting |
| NS | folken.no | 86400 | ns1.nordic.hosting |
| SOA | folken.no | 86400 | ns1.nordic.hosting. domain.nordichosting.com. 2026101202 3600 1200 3600000 3600 |
| TXT | folken.no | 900 | apple-domain-verification=weFhCY37N1e56wWn |
| TXT | folken.no | 900 | facebook-domain-verification=tvpf1mwwlls3f08m7djfm1a7hse7zc |
| TXT | folken.no | 900 | v=spf1 ip4:49.13.104.125 ip4:135.181.136.6 include:cpanel.guru include:nordichosting.com a mx include:_spf.cpanel.guru -all |
| TXT | folken.no | 900 | google-site-verification=Ukmm-zuRl_vnrhh14tns2xRFcZ8KqOHhurE_G0Deeg0 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.