Skip to content

flyn.to

This relatively new domain has few observed referring domains and a low Domain Power Rank.

Domain Power Rank
18.8
About Domain Power Rank
Global Rank
#11,851,748

▼ 4,490,419

Rank in TLD
#3,672

▼ 1,096

Referring Domains
28

▲ 10

Avg. Referrer Power Rank
26.2
Subdomains
1
Domain age
0 yr 7 mo

Referring Domains

Top referring domains
Referring domain Power Rank Global Rank
salesflare.com59.5#19,137
starterstory.com57.0#29,757
crunch.id48.7#120,527
blogpros.com44.7#232,759
laksaboyforum.xyz44.6#238,850
searchxpro.com44.0#262,715
mydigimenu.com43.3#291,047
mate.tools40.0#481,369
gainsty.com38.3#612,483
lflow.co30.3#2,096,072

Basic Information

Registration date
27 Mar 2026
Last updated
1 Apr 2026
Expires
27 Mar 2028 (508 days remaining)
Registrar
Spaceship, Inc.

Subdomain

www.flyn.to

DNS

DNS
Type Name TTL Value
Aflyn.to300172.67.148.234
Aflyn.to300104.21.11.108
AAAAflyn.to3002606:4700:3036::6815:b6c
AAAAflyn.to3002606:4700:3034::ac43:94ea
MXflyn.to36001 aspmx.l.google.com
MXflyn.to360010 alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
MXflyn.to360010 alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
MXflyn.to36005 alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
MXflyn.to36005 alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
NSflyn.to86400hattie.ns.cloudflare.com
NSflyn.to86400randall.ns.cloudflare.com
SOAflyn.to1800hattie.ns.cloudflare.com. dns.cloudflare.com. 2415651894 10000 2400 604800 1800
TXTflyn.to300f2ef511bb249856fe127cd709aba18fc
TXTflyn.to300google-site-verification=MxRCwXPKqy4L0BxrVafZey-3f81N02fZE9OpAtcSbhI
TXTflyn.to300google-site-verification=ZeZrJwFQjHQfx1M2ePBPInb5R3KXUk0gB-Lz3o340oA
TXTflyn.to300v=MCPv1; k=ed25519; p=p+Rxw4ViGoVKTjPVnLPFCMtvSwNx0AKIn9YzOUnha/E=
TXTflyn.to300v=spf1 include:mlrcloud.com include:_spf.google.com ~all

Email Authentication

MX
Valid
SPF
Valid
DMARC
Warning

DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.

Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.