flutesiam.com
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low.
- Global Rank
- #28,227,577
▲ 124,784
- Rank in TLD
- #12,476,626
▲ 49,386
- Referring Domains
- 102
▼ 2
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 17.6
- Subdomains
- 0
- Domain age
- 5 yr 2 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 17.6
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 16.3
- Referring Domains
- 102
- Linked Domains
- 6,384
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 11
10–19 72
20–29 9
30–39 6
40–49 4
50–59 0
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 102
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| ssru.ac.th | 49.6 | #103,951 |
| webofthings.org | 44.7 | #232,673 |
| aquarius-dir.com | 42.6 | #326,624 |
| dicedirectory.com | 41.2 | #403,183 |
| cibunet.com | 39.5 | #516,964 |
| masterplumberoc.com | 34.8 | #1,031,257 |
| educationoutside.org | 32.4 | #1,547,575 |
| vildastamps.com | 32.0 | #1,634,066 |
| gurukulyogashala.com | 31.3 | #1,804,028 |
| metropoltv.co.ke | 30.1 | #2,183,440 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 14 Aug 2021
- Last updated
- 14 Aug 2026
- Expires
- 14 Aug 2027 (282 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com
Subdomain
No data
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | flutesiam.com | 300 | 27.254.145.132 |
| MX | flutesiam.com | 300 | 10 mail.flutesiam.com |
| NS | flutesiam.com | 300 | ns1.flutesiam.com |
| NS | flutesiam.com | 300 | ns2.flutesiam.com |
| SOA | flutesiam.com | 300 | ns2.flutesiam.com. postmaster.flutesiam.com. 2021100701 10800 3600 1209600 10800 |
| TXT | flutesiam.com | 300 | v=spf1 +a +mx +a:thsv58.hostatom.com -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.