flowappic.com
This relatively new domain has few observed referring domains and a low Domain Power Rank.
- Global Rank
- #3,539,295
▲ 346,427
- Rank in TLD
- #1,486,338
▲ 143,533
- Referring Domains
- 25
▲ 4
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 6.9
- Subdomains
- 0
- Domain age
- 2 yr 7 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 6.9
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 5.7
- Referring Domains
- 25
- Linked Domains
- 1,088
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 22
10–19 1
20–29 1
30–39 1
40–49 0
50–59 0
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 25
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| oppalerts.com | 31.8 | #1,668,580 |
| moneyconnet.com | 27.7 | #3,219,511 |
| ahrijy.com | 11.6 | #31,609,770 |
| socialnews-pick.net | 9.6 | #42,450,261 |
| autodesk-viewer.com | 6.7 | #65,626,802 |
| commaend.co.kr | 6.5 | #67,453,947 |
| playstore-pcversion.com | 6.4 | #68,324,029 |
| hancomtaja-free.com | 5.8 | #74,672,848 |
| 거지맵-site.com IDN | 5.7 | #76,606,613 |
| bandicam-free.com | 5.7 | #76,608,683 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 25 Mar 2024
- Last updated
- 23 Oct 2026
- Expires
- 25 Mar 2027 (140 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- client transfer prohibited transfer prohibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- NameSilo, LLC
Subdomain
No data
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | flowappic.com | 60 | 198.13.42.195 |
| NS | flowappic.com | 86400 | carter.ns.cloudflare.com |
| NS | flowappic.com | 86400 | susan.ns.cloudflare.com |
| SOA | flowappic.com | 1800 | carter.ns.cloudflare.com. dns.cloudflare.com. 2416807603 10000 2400 604800 1800 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Warning
No MX record was found, but mail delivery may fall back to this domain’s A or AAAA record.
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.