firstamendmentwatch.org
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate. Links from multiple referring domains appear in the observed data. This domain was registered at least three years ago.
- Global Rank
- #545,927
▼ 79,223
- Rank in TLD
- #61,410
▼ 9,096
- Referring Domains
- 364
▲ 6
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 36.3
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 9 yr 8 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 36.3
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 34.1
- Referring Domains
- 364
- Linked Domains
- 1,025
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 36
10–19 59
20–29 65
30–39 44
40–49 58
50–59 52
60–69 28
70–79 17
80–89 3
90–100 2
Total 364
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| squarespace.com | 90.3 | #46 |
| substack.com | 84.4 | #173 |
| iheart.com | 81.0 | #389 |
| cornell.edu | 80.6 | #424 |
| libsyn.com | 78.5 | #653 |
| ycombinator.com | 78.0 | #705 |
| brookings.edu | 76.6 | #930 |
| nyu.edu | 76.3 | #988 |
| salon.com | 75.0 | #1,277 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .org
- Registration date
- 13 Feb 2017
- Last updated
- 12 Aug 2026
- Expires
- 13 Feb 2027 (100 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited clientUpdateProhibited
- Registry
- Public Interest Registry (PIR)
- Registrar
- Tucows Domains Inc.
Subdomain
www.firstamendmentwatch.org
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | firstamendmentwatch.org | 900 | 70.32.81.50 |
| MX | firstamendmentwatch.org | 900 | 10 mx.hover.com.cust.hostedemail.com |
| NS | firstamendmentwatch.org | 900 | ns2.hover.com |
| NS | firstamendmentwatch.org | 900 | ns1.hover.com |
| SOA | firstamendmentwatch.org | 900 | ns1.hover.com. dnsmaster.hover.com. 1747691784 1800 900 604800 300 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.