filfre.net
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #187,308
▲ 69,139
- Rank in TLD
- #6,109
▲ 2,273
- Referring Domains
- 601
▲ 9
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 29.1
- Subdomains
- 3
- Domain age
- 17 yr 5 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 29.1
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 27.4
- Referring Domains
- 601
- Linked Domains
- 1,981
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 53
10–19 130
20–29 169
30–39 125
40–49 57
50–59 34
60–69 11
70–79 17
80–89 3
90–100 2
Total 601
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| github.com | 93.6 | #19 |
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| archive.org | 87.3 | #86 |
| substack.com | 84.4 | #173 |
| stanford.edu | 83.3 | #237 |
| libsyn.com | 78.5 | #653 |
| ycombinator.com | 78.0 | #705 |
| dev.to | 77.3 | #807 |
| usc.edu | 76.6 | #937 |
| itch.io | 76.5 | #951 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .net
- Registration date
- 29 May 2009
- Last updated
- 28 Apr 2026
- Expires
- 29 May 2027 (205 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- ok
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- DREAMHOST
Subdomain
amiga.filfre.netmaher.filfre.netwww.filfre.net
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | filfre.net | 60 | 173.236.193.142 |
| AAAA | filfre.net | 60 | 2607:f298:5:118a::7fe:ad7b |
| MX | filfre.net | 60 | 0 mx1.mailchannels.net |
| MX | filfre.net | 60 | 0 mx2.mailchannels.net |
| NS | filfre.net | 14400 | ns1.dreamhost.com |
| NS | filfre.net | 14400 | ns3.dreamhost.com |
| NS | filfre.net | 14400 | ns2.dreamhost.com |
| SOA | filfre.net | 60 | ns1.dreamhost.com. hostmaster.dreamhost.com. 2026101003 18090 600 1814400 60 |
| TXT | filfre.net | 60 | v=spf1 mx include:netblocks.dreamhost.com include:relay.mailchannels.net -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.