field-journal.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #327,045
▲ 613,916
- Rank in TLD
- #136,197
▲ 250,254
- Referring Domains
- 178
▲ 19
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 33.8
- Subdomains
- 2
- Domain age
- 12 yr 5 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 33.8
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 29.9
- Referring Domains
- 178
- Linked Domains
- 651
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 7
10–19 38
20–29 44
30–39 33
40–49 20
50–59 19
60–69 10
70–79 3
80–89 2
90–100 2
Total 178
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| google.com | 99.8 | #1 |
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| berkeley.edu | 80.7 | #415 |
| constantcontact.com | 80.6 | #429 |
| hku.hk | 78.2 | #683 |
| ucsd.edu | 75.7 | #1,113 |
| uci.edu | 73.8 | #1,607 |
| ucr.edu | 69.8 | #3,524 |
| wikiquote.org | 69.6 | #3,608 |
| hyperallergic.com | 66.2 | #6,205 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 27 May 2014
- Last updated
- 13 May 2026
- Expires
- 27 May 2027 (204 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- ok
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- TUCOWS.COM, CO.
Subdomain
stagetemple.field-journal.comwww.field-journal.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | field-journal.com | 900 | 198.46.82.252 |
| MX | field-journal.com | 900 | 0 field-journal.com |
| NS | field-journal.com | 14400 | ns2.webhostinghub.com |
| NS | field-journal.com | 14400 | ns1.webhostinghub.com |
| SOA | field-journal.com | 14400 | ns1.webhostinghub.com. null.webhostinghub.com. 2024072403 86400 7200 3600000 86400 |
| TXT | field-journal.com | 14400 | v=spf1 +mx +a +ip4:198.46.82.33 +include:smtp.servconfig.com ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Configuration error
An SPF policy referenced by include or redirect is missing, invalid or causes a loop.
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.