fib.no
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #270,161
▼ 7,597
- Rank in TLD
- #845
▼ 50
- Referring Domains
- 488
▲ 10
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 28.3
- Subdomains
- 4
- Domain age
- 15 yr 11 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 28.3
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 26.5
- Referring Domains
- 488
- Linked Domains
- 558
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 26
10–19 119
20–29 156
30–39 98
40–49 59
50–59 19
60–69 4
70–79 2
80–89 3
90–100 2
Total 488
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| squarespace.com | 90.3 | #46 |
| weebly.com | 87.4 | #85 |
| outlook.com | 86.2 | #119 |
| substack.com | 84.4 | #173 |
| storyblok.com | 74.6 | #1,384 |
| google.no | 70.1 | #3,313 |
| nrk.no | 68.9 | #4,104 |
| uib.no | 66.2 | #6,228 |
| concordia.ca | 66.1 | #6,329 |
Basic Information
Subdomain
billett.fib.nodemo.fib.nowww.fib.nowwww.fib.no
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | fib.no | 3600 | 216.150.1.1 |
| MX | fib.no | 172800 | 10 fib-no.mail.protection.outlook.com |
| NS | fib.no | 7200 | ns1.hyp.net |
| NS | fib.no | 7200 | ns2.hyp.net |
| NS | fib.no | 7200 | ns3.hyp.net |
| SOA | fib.no | 3600 | ns1.hyp.net. hostmaster.domeneshop.no. 1793530407 14400 3600 1209600 3600 |
| TXT | fib.no | 86400 | MS=ms23498019 |
| TXT | fib.no | 86400 | festspillene.azurewebsites.net |
| TXT | fib.no | 86400 | asv=58d4f29c8ee805639fd95713b3c04130 |
| TXT | fib.no | 86400 | DomainVerification=E8ODKE2W020MQJ9EX4MG3TITBW99BIBRNNZQEKCSMICZKKVE6BSPV18U63MMXG9P |
| TXT | fib.no | 86400 | v=spf1 ip4:193.71.134.4 mx include:servers.mcsv.net include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.online.superoffice.com include:sendgrid.net include:mail.zendesk.com -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Valid
DMARC is set to p=reject, asking receiving servers to reject messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.