ffap.net
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #367,175
▲ 43,772
- Rank in TLD
- #12,112
▲ 1,524
- Referring Domains
- 199
▲ 3
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 24.4
- Subdomains
- 4
- Domain age
- 26 yr 8 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 24.4
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 21.1
- Referring Domains
- 199
- Linked Domains
- 290
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 16
10–19 75
20–29 63
30–39 22
40–49 7
50–59 7
60–69 6
70–79 2
80–89 0
90–100 1
Total 199
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| free.fr | 78.2 | #681 |
| over-blog.com | 72.3 | #2,199 |
| openedition.org | 69.1 | #4,027 |
| webador.fr | 67.8 | #4,913 |
| laposte.fr | 67.5 | #5,173 |
| eklablog.com | 62.5 | #11,235 |
| univ-lille.fr | 61.5 | #13,383 |
| online.fr | 60.8 | #15,246 |
| umontpellier.fr | 58.6 | #22,555 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .net
- Registration date
- 23 Feb 2000
- Last updated
- 24 Feb 2026
- Expires
- 23 Feb 2027 (110 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientDeleteProhibited clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- OVH, SAS
Subdomain
membres.ffap.netwww.membres.ffap.netwww.new.ffap.netwww.ffap.net
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | ffap.net | 60 | 164.132.235.17 |
| AAAA | ffap.net | 60 | 2001:41d0:301::23 |
| MX | ffap.net | 60 | 1 mx1.ovh.net |
| MX | ffap.net | 60 | 5 mx2.ovh.net |
| NS | ffap.net | 60 | ns.ovh.net |
| NS | ffap.net | 60 | dns.ovh.net |
| SOA | ffap.net | 60 | dns.ovh.net. tech.ovh.net. 2091756151 86400 3600 3600000 86400 |
| TXT | ffap.net | 60 | v=spf1 include:mx.ovh.com ~all |
| TXT | ffap.net | 60 | google-site-verification=fI-2O5AK2LEJE4Z0kkrTpoNarm0c5Mg0Lw3_ZbpCNgY |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.