feedlerapp.com
This relatively new domain has few observed referring domains and a low Domain Power Rank.
- Global Rank
- #3,994,874
▲ 54,404,950
- Rank in TLD
- #1,674,012
▲ 25,449,421
- Referring Domains
- 2
▲ 1
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 57.3
- Subdomains
- 0
- Domain age
- 0 yr 4 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 57.3
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 57.3
- Referring Domains
- 2
- Linked Domains
- 15
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 0
10–19 0
20–29 0
30–39 1
40–49 0
50–59 0
60–69 0
70–79 1
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 2
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| mastodon.social | 79.6 | #539 |
| easypodcast.it | 34.9 | #1,009,385 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 9 Jun 2026
- Last updated
- 2 Nov 2026
- Expires
- 9 Jun 2030 (1,312 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientDeleteProhibited clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- OVH, SAS
Subdomain
No Observed Data
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | feedlerapp.com | 3600 | 188.165.6.20 |
| AAAA | feedlerapp.com | 3600 | 2001:41d0:301:3::21 |
| MX | feedlerapp.com | 3600 | 1 mx1.mail.ovh.net |
| MX | feedlerapp.com | 3600 | 5 mx2.mail.ovh.net |
| MX | feedlerapp.com | 3600 | 100 mx3.mail.ovh.net |
| NS | feedlerapp.com | 3600 | ns109.ovh.net |
| NS | feedlerapp.com | 3600 | dns109.ovh.net |
| SOA | feedlerapp.com | 3600 | dns109.ovh.net. tech.ovh.net. 2092361119 86400 3600 3600000 60 |
| TXT | feedlerapp.com | 3600 | 1|www.feedlerapp.com |
| TXT | feedlerapp.com | 3600 | v=spf1 include:mx.ovh.com -all |
| TXT | feedlerapp.com | 3600 | google-site-verification=v8N_b1N83w1-eCxE5OtI5SVGRwrCTRyBe6TZU8htZIs |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.