feedipedia.org
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #224,198
▲ 10,402
- Rank in TLD
- #25,663
▲ 928
- Referring Domains
- 628
▲ 10
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 28.8
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 15 yr 9 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 28.8
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 25.7
- Referring Domains
- 628
- Linked Domains
- 1,625
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 81
10–19 138
20–29 160
30–39 100
40–49 67
50–59 42
60–69 18
70–79 13
80–89 7
90–100 2
Total 628
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| squarespace.com | 90.3 | #46 |
| bit.ly | 88.4 | #67 |
| weebly.com | 87.4 | #85 |
| nih.gov | 87.1 | #91 |
| admin.ch | 81.4 | #361 |
| weforum.org | 81.2 | #374 |
| mdpi.com | 80.3 | #459 |
| frontiersin.org | 80.3 | #465 |
| cmu.edu | 79.4 | #555 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .org
- Registration date
- 11 Jan 2011
- Last updated
- 1 Nov 2025
- Expires
- 11 Jan 2027 (67 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientDeleteProhibited clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- Public Interest Registry (PIR)
- Registrar
- OVH, SAS
Subdomain
www.feedipedia.org
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | feedipedia.org | 86400 | 213.186.33.4 |
| AAAA | feedipedia.org | 86400 | 2001:41d0:1:1b00:213:186:33:4 |
| MX | feedipedia.org | 86400 | 1 mx4.mail.ovh.net |
| MX | feedipedia.org | 86400 | 10 mx3.mail.ovh.net |
| NS | feedipedia.org | 86400 | ns200.anycast.me |
| NS | feedipedia.org | 86400 | dns200.anycast.me |
| SOA | feedipedia.org | 86400 | dns200.anycast.me. tech.ovh.net. 2093210657 86400 3600 3600000 86400 |
| TXT | feedipedia.org | 86400 | google-site-verification=FdR2j4EDp_KeJb6VJsOZfyiq6We6UFbPbvDiJ4GbDTA |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.