feedbacktalk.ru
This relatively new domain has few observed referring domains and a low Domain Power Rank.
- Global Rank
- #9,105,302
▼ 1,281,741
- Rank in TLD
- #198,714
▼ 17,686
- Referring Domains
- 16
▲ 1
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 30.4
- Subdomains
- 4
- Domain age
- 2 yr 1 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 30.4
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 28.8
- Referring Domains
- 16
- Linked Domains
- 40
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 2
10–19 2
20–29 5
30–39 2
40–49 3
50–59 1
60–69 1
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 16
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| unisender.com | 60.9 | #14,991 |
| iidf.ru | 50.2 | #93,066 |
| pressfeed.ru | 47.4 | #148,924 |
| arppsoft.ru | 44.6 | #238,647 |
| in-scale.ru | 40.9 | #418,731 |
| soware.ru | 37.7 | #660,232 |
| picktech.ru | 35.0 | #990,110 |
| hightime.media | 29.7 | #2,321,808 |
| trustedservice.ru | 27.8 | #3,168,513 |
| gruzdevv.ru | 24.3 | #5,250,842 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .ruRussia
- Registration date
- 1 Oct 2024
- Expires
- 1 Oct 2027 (330 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- REGISTERED DELEGATED VERIFIED
- Registry
- Coordination Center for TLD RU
- Registrar
- REGRU-RU
Subdomain
api.feedbacktalk.rudemo-api.feedbacktalk.rudrive-api.feedbacktalk.ruti-api.feedbacktalk.ru
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | feedbacktalk.ru | 3600 | 185.215.4.12 |
| NS | feedbacktalk.ru | 3600 | ns1.reg.ru |
| NS | feedbacktalk.ru | 3600 | ns2.reg.ru |
| SOA | feedbacktalk.ru | 3600 | ns1.reg.ru. hostmaster.ns1.reg.ru. 1792491359 14400 3600 604800 3600 |
| TXT | feedbacktalk.ru | 3600 | v=spf1 include:spf.unisender.ru ~all |
| TXT | feedbacktalk.ru | 3600 | google-gws-recovery-domain-verification=76060910 |
| TXT | feedbacktalk.ru | 3600 | unisender-go-validate-hash=950f398f700b950c34b6b5901a0cd210 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Warning
No MX record was found, but mail delivery may fall back to this domain’s A or AAAA record.
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.