fancytalegame.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #484,959
▲ 41,729
- Rank in TLD
- #199,544
▲ 15,046
- Referring Domains
- 12
▲ 1
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 41.9
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 10 yr 8 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 41.9
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 28.9
- Referring Domains
- 12
- Linked Domains
- 13
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 0
10–19 2
20–29 5
30–39 0
40–49 2
50–59 1
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 2
Total 12
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| google.com | 99.8 | #1 |
| apple.com | 93.5 | #22 |
| adapty.io | 53.8 | #51,154 |
| sweetnitro.com | 41.3 | #394,561 |
| tastytalegame.com | 40.3 | #461,690 |
| football-champions.com | 28.9 | #2,662,307 |
| basketball-manager.net | 28.9 | #2,674,318 |
| handball-manager.fr | 28.8 | #2,722,950 |
| rugby-manager.com | 28.7 | #2,755,436 |
| touchdownmanager.com | 28.7 | #2,768,791 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 22 Feb 2016
- Last updated
- 23 Feb 2025
- Expires
- 22 Feb 2027 (109 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientDeleteProhibited clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- OVH, SAS
Subdomain
www.fancytalegame.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | fancytalegame.com | 3600 | 37.187.73.156 |
| MX | fancytalegame.com | 3600 | 10 mx3.mail.ovh.net |
| MX | fancytalegame.com | 3600 | 1 mx4.mail.ovh.net |
| NS | fancytalegame.com | 3600 | ns200.anycast.me |
| NS | fancytalegame.com | 3600 | dns200.anycast.me |
| SOA | fancytalegame.com | 3600 | dns200.anycast.me. tech.ovh.net. 2021031100 86400 3600 3600000 300 |
| TXT | fancytalegame.com | 3600 | 1|www.fancytalegame.com |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.