exali.de
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively high.
- Global Rank
- #38,002
▼ 1,867
- Rank in TLD
- #1,334
▼ 29
- Referring Domains
- 1,272
▼ 63
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 19.6
- Subdomains
- 4
- Domain age
- –
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 19.6
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 18.9
- Referring Domains
- 1,272
- Linked Domains
- 664
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 287
10–19 398
20–29 363
30–39 148
40–49 48
50–59 20
60–69 4
70–79 3
80–89 1
90–100 0
Total 1,272
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| iubenda.com | 84.0 | #192 |
| mystrikingly.com | 71.8 | #2,409 |
| mynewsdesk.com | 70.9 | #2,844 |
| kit.edu | 70.5 | #3,092 |
| shopware.com | 69.1 | #4,005 |
| openpetition.de | 64.5 | #8,115 |
| funnelcockpit.com | 62.3 | #11,647 |
| drschwenke.de | 62.1 | #11,980 |
| holvi.com | 59.5 | #18,935 |
| ekomi.de | 58.8 | #21,739 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .deGermany
- Last updated
- 17 Feb 2026
- Domain statuses
- active
- Registry
- DENIC eG
Subdomain
mein.exali.dergblog.exali.desiegel.exali.dewww.exali.de
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | exali.de | 600 | 88.217.234.253 |
| MX | exali.de | 600 | 100 mx.exali.de |
| MX | exali.de | 600 | 20 mx2.exali.de |
| MX | exali.de | 600 | 10 aug.exali.de |
| NS | exali.de | 600 | ns4.mxp.zone |
| NS | exali.de | 600 | ns2.mxp.zone |
| NS | exali.de | 600 | ns1.mxp.zone |
| NS | exali.de | 600 | ns3.mxp.zone |
| SOA | exali.de | 600 | ns1.mxp.zone. domains.mxp.de. 2025073102 43200 7200 1209600 600 |
| TXT | exali.de | 600 | MS=ms43754845 |
| TXT | exali.de | 600 | v=spf1 mx -all |
| TXT | exali.de | 600 | sendinblue-code:5d965ce957f7333a433acf3070fefd0e |
| TXT | exali.de | 600 | brevo-code:5d965ce957f7333a433acf3070fefd0e |
| TXT | exali.de | 600 | facebook-domain-verification=b39hewog10os0qxyjat5hg4dornuew |
| TXT | exali.de | 600 | MDx6TR6RxxcOavZgXBCze2QJIvhNARDd |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=quarantine, asking receiving servers to quarantine messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.