everythink.nc
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low.
- Global Rank
- #15,277,977
▼ 110,753
- Rank in TLD
- #644
▼ 14
- Referring Domains
- 4
－
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 21.4
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 12 yr 1 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 21.4
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 20.5
- Referring Domains
- 4
- Linked Domains
- 52
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 0
10–19 2
20–29 1
30–39 1
40–49 0
50–59 0
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 4
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| plan.nc | 33.0 | #1,413,644 |
| matchfolio.fr | 21.4 | #7,794,427 |
| amphitea.com | 19.6 | #10,342,237 |
| lamaisondelacloture.nc | 11.7 | #31,204,485 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .ncNew Caledonia
- Registration date
- 10 Sept 2014
- Expires
- 10 Sept 2031 (1,770 days remaining)
- Registrar
- NONE
Subdomain
www.everythink.nc
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | everythink.nc | 86400 | 202.171.68.68 |
| MX | everythink.nc | 86400 | 1 aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | everythink.nc | 86400 | 5 alt1.aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | everythink.nc | 86400 | 5 alt2.aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | everythink.nc | 86400 | 10 alt3.aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | everythink.nc | 86400 | 10 alt4.aspmx.l.google.com |
| NS | everythink.nc | 86400 | dns-1.fenollar.fr |
| NS | everythink.nc | 86400 | dns-2.fenollar.fr |
| SOA | everythink.nc | 86400 | dns.fenollar.fr. guillaume.fenollar.fr. 2026011901 86400 86400 1209600 86400 |
| TXT | everythink.nc | 86400 | v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:fenollar.fr ~all |
| TXT | everythink.nc | 86400 | google-site-verification=t6a0UuLFamJvzQXQ3xdp_7yNcHztqv090FDb_r8nh3k |
| TXT | everythink.nc | 86400 | pikojve7bph4ro2usb5bbr1s37 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Configuration error
SPF exceeds the limit of 10 DNS lookups.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.