evanfeng.dev
This relatively new domain has few observed referring domains and a low Domain Power Rank.
- Global Rank
- #5,037,100
▲ 129,773,318
- Rank in TLD
- #17,540
▲ 303,981
- Referring Domains
- 1
▲ 1
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 93.6
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 1 yr 9 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 93.6
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 93.6
- Referring Domains
- 1
- Linked Domains
- 23
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 0
10–19 0
20–29 0
30–39 0
40–49 0
50–59 0
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 1
Total 1
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| github.com | 93.6 | #19 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .dev
- Registration date
- 3 Feb 2025
- Last updated
- 3 Dec 2025
- Expires
- 3 Feb 2028 (455 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientDeleteProhibited clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- Charleston Road Registry Inc.
- Registrar
- Porkbun LLC
Subdomain
go.evanfeng.dev
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | evanfeng.dev | 300 | 104.21.16.20 |
| A | evanfeng.dev | 300 | 172.67.165.246 |
| AAAA | evanfeng.dev | 300 | 2606:4700:3034::6815:1014 |
| AAAA | evanfeng.dev | 300 | 2606:4700:3035::ac43:a5f6 |
| MX | evanfeng.dev | 300 | 10 glacier.mxrouting.net |
| MX | evanfeng.dev | 300 | 20 glacier-relay.mxrouting.net |
| NS | evanfeng.dev | 86400 | elmo.ns.cloudflare.com |
| NS | evanfeng.dev | 86400 | sydney.ns.cloudflare.com |
| SOA | evanfeng.dev | 1800 | elmo.ns.cloudflare.com. dns.cloudflare.com. 2418478911 10000 2400 604800 1800 |
| TXT | evanfeng.dev | 300 | v=spf1 include:mxlogin.com ~all |
| TXT | evanfeng.dev | 300 | google-site-verification=mVHN1UWuSQdS1Q3WgkV4WAcNWOfCUVZi5LYEKYMvUjA |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.