espine.in
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #542,819
▲ 103,242
- Rank in TLD
- #3,175
▲ 908
- Referring Domains
- 59
▼ 3
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 30.4
- Subdomains
- 3
- Domain age
- 10 yr 5 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 30.4
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 27.8
- Referring Domains
- 59
- Linked Domains
- 173
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 4
10–19 12
20–29 18
30–39 8
40–49 13
50–59 2
60–69 1
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 1
Total 59
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| google.com | 99.8 | #1 |
| bgsu.edu | 62.4 | #11,505 |
| saashub.com | 58.4 | #23,357 |
| raindance.org | 54.9 | #42,737 |
| axisrooms.com | 47.3 | #153,694 |
| purekonect.com | 46.0 | #190,205 |
| relevantdirectories.com | 43.3 | #292,373 |
| readdive.com | 43.0 | #304,142 |
| baddiehub.org.uk | 42.9 | #307,995 |
| busybudgeter.com | 42.3 | #342,412 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .inIndia
- Registration date
- 26 May 2016
- Last updated
- 11 Dec 2025
- Expires
- 26 May 2027 (202 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited clientRenewProhibited clientDeleteProhibited clientUpdateProhibited
- Registry
- National Internet Exchange of India
- Registrar
- GoDaddy
Subdomain
bms.espine.intrader.espine.inwww.espine.in
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | espine.in | 600 | 198.202.211.1 |
| MX | espine.in | 600 | 0 espine-in.mail.protection.outlook.com |
| NS | espine.in | 3600 | ns29.domaincontrol.com |
| NS | espine.in | 3600 | ns30.domaincontrol.com |
| SOA | espine.in | 600 | ns29.domaincontrol.com. dns.jomax.net. 2026011700 28800 7200 604800 600 |
| TXT | espine.in | 600 | v=spf1 include:spfa.cpmails.com include:4txbdwuws.spf.checkpoint-spf.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all |
| TXT | espine.in | 600 | MS=ms19265785 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Warning
The SPF check could not be completed because of too many DNS references or macros.
- DMARC
- Valid
DMARC is set to p=reject, asking receiving servers to reject messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.